The HIV Virus AIDS Lie – HIV DOES NOT CAUSE AIDS
July 23, 2010 by Guest Author
Filed under About Grants
Hello Everyone. I posted this vid clip of a lecture I attended on August 18, 1995 in Costa Mesa, California. This was a lecture given by Dr. Peter Duesberg, Christine Maggiore and Jon Rappaport. The reason I went to this lecture was because I was an avid listener of a radio talk show host Roy Tuckman aka Roy of Hollywood. Roy used to host (maybe still does) a show called “Somethings Happening” on Pacifica Radio. This is a non-profit listener supported radio station based in Los Angeles, California,. It is on radio dial 90.7 FM. Tuesday nights/Wednesday mornings was “Health Night”. Roy would play an array of dissident voices not heard on main stream corporate media from 12 am to 6 am He would play amazing multi-hour commercial free discussions and lectures on a wide variety of health topics. Some of the 6 hour airplay was devoted to doctor’s, phd’s, AIDS victims, who challenged the Gallo Aids hypothesis. They discussed how no scientific method was used when the AIDS paradigm was decided by one man. Anyone who challenged this theory was met by government grants taken away from dissident doctors and researchers. Physical attacks and character assassinations were conducted against people who questioned the non-validated theory. My personal favorite commentator/lecturer was Gary Null PHD who described being spit on by “The AIDS community” after giving a lecture. I posted a short clip (here) of Dr. Duesberg discussing how the AIDS theory was impossible. At first, the reaction …
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Link to Obama’s Weekly Address for this week: www.youtube.com Link to HotAir article on this subject: hotair.com …You know, the Left and Democrats have constantly promoted the idea of so-called ‘green’ or ‘clean’ energy as a solution to global warming and the answer for our long-term energy needs. They’ve worked hard at putting a stop to off-shore drilling, coal mining, land drilling and nuclear energy. Energy resources that we have bountiful supplies of, by the way. When you look at coal and our undeveloped shale oil resources, we are the future of fossil fuel on this earth. The left has pushed off-shore drilling out to the deep ocean where catastrophes become monumentally harder to solve at it’s unwelcoming and uncompromising depths. They’ve given many people the idea that green energy is this genie in a bottle that energy companies refuse to let out. That energy companies are willfully destroying the environment and making a profit from it because they want to keep so-called ’superior technology’ under wraps. That the entire pursuit of providing all of us with affordable energy that we all demand and require in our daily lives is evil. This foolish notion involves the belief in a conspiracy which goes against the mechanisms of how a free market actually works. The left does this while they currently deny the fact that global warming scientists have been recently found to have manipulated temperature data that call into question the very credibility of the entire …
Video Rating: 4 / 5
@ArchaicRevivalx2012 Can you please post the whole lecture? Duesberg’s conferences are very interesting but very hard to find. There is another one here in youtube called “the human immunodeficiency virus and scientific integrity”. Thanks.
@katkinsful OK, I think you should start by not confusing apples with oranges. Chickenpox/Shingles are caused by viruses while HIV is a retrovirus. Retroviruses are known for the fact that they can’t produce disease. They can’t produce disease because they don’t kill the cells they infect. They don’t kill the cells they infect because they replicate at the same time the host cell divides itself into 2 new cells (mitosis), and because retroviruses live as parasites of the cells they infect.
@ArchaicRevivalx2012 Thank you so much for posting this lecture. Whether Dr. D. is right or wrong, it’s very scary to me so see an important scientific issue politicized and emotionalized to the point where a person called a bigot or ignorant for questioning prevailing theory. The angry-herd reaction to Peter Duesberg and Bjorn Lomborg demonstrates that moden people are just as dogmatic in their “thinking” as the priests who imprisoned Galileo.
it was people like koolaid who show the true colours – people without their own ideas piggy backing the awful ’science’ and strawman tactics synonymous with aids dissidents without any understanding of science, let alone epidemiology and virology.
@katkinsful I presume that some scientists came back at you, so you closed your account.
@trinichick76 To see how the people ho take the “lifesaving” meds usually wind up dying…google
Hiv Defendant Prevails Over Pharmacuetical Propaganda
To see how “effective” the meds are Google….20 Unanswerable Questions For Aids Inc
and check out question #20. Direct links to the peer reviewed studies are included in the article
@trinichick76 There was only one editor of Continum and NO he didn’t die of aids. Maybe wikipedia isn’t te best place to “research” scientific issues
Even the “discoverer” never found any such virusof mass destruction in ANY of his aids patients. Therei s no and there has never been “hiv” viremia in aids patients.
The only people dying of”hiv” are people with underying heath issues or those who took the “lifesaving” meds. The tests ae garbage & the meds are deadly poison. Have a nice day
Lol, why waste your time trying to convince crazy people of the truth. Let them not take their drugs and go the way of the editors of ‘Continuum Magazine’. Oops, none of them died of AIDS related diseases either.
Yep. It’s also been added to the list of known carcinogens as of Dec 2009
@mykoolaidtastesfunny
AZT is killing them…
@katkinsful
hes been studying viruses for thirty years, i think he knows more than us. look at the documentry the aids hoax and he explains what he means by the simplest virus around.
@katkinsful
since hes been a virologist for thirty years, he knows what he talking about. watch the aids hoax and he explains about chicken pox etc and HIV.. it does not aids
@tarbmuffin
no, watch the video.
Lern more about MMS(Miracle Mineral Suplement) by Jim Humble /watch?v=_g1UCrLWrGY
Go watch Montagnier admitting we’ve been lied to for 25 years….he just won the Nobel Prize for “hiv”…on youtube
Nobel Laureate Montagnier: HIV Can Be Cleared Naturally – House of Numbers
He admits that “hiv” won’t make healthy people sick and that immune problems can be treated with nutrition except there’s no profit in nutrition. Go see for yourselves. It’s my featured video for anyone who can’t find it
This a great example of his trolling ways, lol
Re: ……Deconstructing the MYTH of AIDS………
humanshot1 (1 month ago) +1 Reply | Spam
“Efficient isolation of HIV from plasma during different stages of HIV infection”
OOPS..the idiot forgets which socketpuppet account he’s on when switching back and forth to spam people and give himself applause. He does that a lot. There are FOUR Humanshot accounts…Humanshot Humanshot1 Humanshot2 & Humanshit3
it actually doesn’t and more AIDS doesn’t exist
I have already explained to you, koolybabe, Rodney was only a mediocre biochemist. This is exemplified by you and Rodney himself – he never understood that the tests he was asked to develop were not meant to assess if HIV particles were present in the patient. They were assessing only if the subject had been exposed to HIV. Rodney’s inferior intellect, like your inferior intellect, could never get round this basic idea. As a consequence of you and Rodney’s inferior intellect, people have died.
OK, that’s it… I am now at 8.51 and dumbfounded.
Has Deusberg never heard of permanent integration and the ‘dormancy’ of retroviruses? Has he never heard of Chicken pox / Shingles?
Rodney Richards, Ph.D., worked on the development of antibody (ELISA) and genetic “viral load” tests for Amgen and holds some related patents. “The diagnosis of being HIV positive is based on arbitrary combinations of tests, none of which are approved for diagnosing HIV,” he says. “In fact there is no test for HIV. It’s just an illusion.”
Rethinkaids com quotes on aids section. People can also google…IS HIV REALLY THE CAUSE OF AIDS?ARE THERE REALLY ONLY “A FEW”SCIENTISTS WHO DOUBT THIS?
IlSeFousDeTaGuele Nousides Rasnixful Ccr5 TravianCollege Humanshot Humanshot1 Humanshot2 Humanshot etc etc Conotoxin etc ETC lmao are all the same troll boy. I have the list of his known troll accounts on my channel and SOME of the videos where he goes on spamming campaigns against everyone he …I mean “they” ha ha …disagrees with. Some videos everyone has been censored but him. Looks like this is one of them.
You have to hit show spam though because he likes to use his multiple accounts to censor critics.
To learn more about the “hiv” tests google….
WHOSE ANTIBODIES ARE THEY ANYWAY?
Factors Known to Cause False Positive HIV Antibody Test Results
PLAYING RUSSIAN ROULETTE IN THE LABORATORY
CAN YOU REALLY TRUST HIV TESTING?
HIV POSITIVE ? DEPENDS ON WHERE YOU LIVE…THE HIV WESTERN BLOT TEST
INTERVIEW RODNEY RICHARDS
Why the “HIV Tests” Can’t Tell You Whether You Have HIV
Who better to go to than someone who actually develops the tests?
How would you know? Are you an “hiv” testing specialist? Do you develop the “hiv” tests?
No, all the proteins are not tested.
@yaboy40511 My little two step plan is by no means a permanent fix, but it is something that can happen RIGHT NOW and will be useful until we can find alternate ways to power our vehicles. We need to shift the use of oil from power to strictly cars in order to prolong its worth. Until then we need to be finding better ways to power our cars than by plugging it into the wall and driving for 30 minutes.
@yaboy40511 If the nuclear waste is deposed of in a manner expected out of someone with half a mind, it’s entirely safe. Coal can be burned cleanly. I honestly don’t know what else to tell you on that issue other than look it up because it certainly is true. Oil is finite, I see that, but if we use it in cars, and cars only, that will PROLONG its usage. Burning it for energy is daft and wasteful when there are other ways of obtaining power.
@2bpilot The issue with oil is that it is a finite resource in a world which is becoming increasingly industrialized. In the developing world (such as China, India, Brazil…countries which are investing in green technology by the way), there is a greater need for energy. Add this fact with our own obscene oil consumption and this means that as we move forward into the future oil will gradually and consistently become more expensive.
@2bpilot Actually nuclear power is not clean, there is a substantial amount of waste that is produced, and this waste is usually disposed of in various developing countries (not that this is a concern for many), and the fact remains “clean coal” doesn’t exist and NEVER has…nope, no such thing as clean coal…solar power exists, as does wind power, but not “clean coal.”
@yaboy40511 Nuclear is clean, and coal can be burned cleanly. Apparently you don’t keep up with these sorts of things. Oil IS finite, but it can hold us out alot longer when used in cars and be cheap at the same time if we actually use it now whilst finding alternate ways to power our cars affordably at the same time. I don’t see why we should just surrender to the fact that oil is finite.
@2bpilot
The mere fact that you argue that
1. Coal and nuclear are clean
2. Drilling in the United States will completely satisfy our consumption of oil, while ignoring the fact that oil is a finite resource
shows that you have no idea what you’re talking about…but hey I admit it is difficult for me to deal with a simple mind.
@yaboy40511 I do apologize that very simple things like this come hard for you.
@2bpilot
that was one of the most mind numbingly dumb things I have ever read…
Politicizing green energy, as Obama has, is not justified on any level. Green energy is much more attainable outside of government interference, as shanedk pointed out in this vid: watch?v=xta4c731F-Y
@mcap52 Obama is interested in control. Period. Petrolium is in everything, EVERYTHING, your computer, your desk, fake finger nails, plastic cups, your cloths, and so on. It’s God made and man used. Now, do you need it? yep. Now whats best for America, produce our own, or buy it from our enemies???
@twanger88 Do you forget that for the last 2 yrs of Bush, Dems held all the power? And Obama was voting right along with them? Wanna talk about spending?? So, in effect, Obama voted in our debt. Then went on to triple it?
I would like the government to step aside and not help out the big oil companies. I do believe ethanol is making a difference. i also think if nether ethanol or gas was subsidies by the government ethanol would still be hear. in 2009 US produced 10.75 billion gallons of ethanol even with a loss in efficiency that is a lot of fuel. I doubt any other country could or would pick up that much slack. I think it is projected to be over 14 billion gallons in 2010. I do believe in Peak Oil.
@twanger88
How doesn’t truth solve anything. I have a partisan point of view, alright. I understand free markets. I don’t think ‘green’ energy is a dumb idea, I just think the government subsidizing it and taxing other forms of energy to pay for it is a dumb idea. You don’t get it.
@RevolutionOfCG
The left doesn’t get that concept that the free market is superior than the government at producing goods and services.
Hello Del just wanted to say hey im all for this green energy vibe thing going on. In fact i like the green view of Dr.Seuss.. ya know GREEN EGGS AND HAM.
Dude, I understand you have your point of view but your partisan point of view (right wing) doesn’t solve anything. I subscribed to your videos awhile back because I thought you were an independent thinker but to think that green energy is a dumb idea than your not seeing the greater picture. Sure, Obama has his problems but the crisis that he walked into was left to him by George W Bush.
@mcap52
Oh yeah.
@USAGymnast It will evidently create many jobs for the public sector,otherwise Obama would not be interested in it.
I believe that we have found thru looking at other countries who have tried the “green energy”way that for every “green job” created we will lose two industrial jobs. So I am wondering what those who are left out of the “green” paradise will be doing. Oh,I forgot…unemployment checks are the best way to create jobs
@USAGymnast There is evidence that shows the opposite is true, in Spain for example, every green job created causes the loss of 2 jobs. That is te reality of what Obamas schemes are going to do to America. The economists are saying that we should get used to 10% unemployment. It is what is expected now with the Obama policies in effect.
@USAGymnast I agree, I think that the Obama administrations plan is to make all other forms of electrical generation so expensive through the cap and trade scheme, that solar will be less expensive than coal energy plants. This would take making coal more than 17 times more expensive than it is now.
@intrepidorator
How about letting the free market determine this situation? If you want to put in solar panels, that’s great. As long as you don’t force others to do the same thing.
science fiction.
I was just at a yoga retreat w/solar. We tried to watch a film and when the sun went down, well that was it. Light bulbs lasted a couple of hours after the sun went down. This is crazy! We aren’t a 3rd world country to have to live like this. This is all for Soros and his gang. And as for us “using up” all the resourses at the expense of the 3rd world countries, that’s all a lie. They don’t have anything because of a combination of the following: socialism, communism and/or dictatorships.
@patricksk1123 Nothing to worry about with nuclear plants. The name does bear close resemblance to “nuclear bomb,” but that doesn’t mean it’s going to blow up. If you can get a team of educated and willing people to run a nuclear plant, you might as well build a preschool beside it! It truly is the way of the future, we’ve just got to build them and put smart people to work in them.