Ron Paul: Now It’s Assassinations (2010)

January 28, 2012 by Guest Author  
Filed under About Grants

 

February 25, 2010 www.amazon.com thefilmarchived.blogspot.com Ronald Ernest “Ron” Paul (born August 20, 1935) is an American physician and Republican Congressman for the 14th congressional district of Texas. Paul serves on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, the Joint Economic Committee, the Committee on Financial Services and is Chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy where he has been an outspoken critic of American foreign and monetary policy. He has gained prominence for his libertarian positions on many political issues, often clashing with both Republican and Democratic Party leaders. Paul has run for President of the United States twice, first in 1988 as the nominee of the Libertarian Party and again in 2008 as a candidate for the Republican nomination. He is the founder of the advocacy group Campaign for Liberty and his ideas have been expressed in numerous published articles and books, including End The Fed (2009), The Revolution: A Manifesto (2008), Pillars of Prosperity (2008), A Foreign Policy of Freedom: Peace, Commerce, and Honest Friendship (2007), The Case for Gold (1982), and a new book Liberty Defined: 50 Essential Issues That Affect Our Freedom (2011) due out in April. According to a 1998 study published in the American Journal of Political Science, Paul had the most conservative voting record of any member of Congress since 1937. His son Rand Paul was sworn in as a Senator for Kentucky in 2011, making the
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Grants and Scholarship Tips

Comments

24 Responses to “Ron Paul: Now It’s Assassinations (2010)”

  1. donnyforte2 on January 28th, 2012 9:21 pm

    @MrGoble66 He’s an evangelical Christian. The legislation he’s supported and sponsored says it all. That’s practically the only shit he’s concerned with. Do you not realize that 419 of his 420-odd bills since 1997 never even passed the committee, let alone make it to the floor of the House? This guy is KING of symbolism and rhetoric. That’s it.

  2. MrGoble66 on January 28th, 2012 9:42 pm

    @donnyforte2 I’m not saying you’re wrong, but isn’t it true that you can’t really say ALL CANDIDATES have special interest groups. I mean they might, but you don’t know that for sure. So best not be talking in absolutes, It just doesn’t make for a good counter argument. In any discussion or argument, i feel it’s best to present facts and let people make up their own mind, rather than stating something with absolutly no backing behind it.

  3. donnyforte2 on January 28th, 2012 10:05 pm

    @Starpilot149 Argue with the Constitution? It’s been argued with since its introduction, it’s not a Bible or infallible and all candidates have special interests groups. You don’t spend your entire career as a do-nothing politician and not have special interests.
    “has the Constitution and the PEOPLE”
    Bunch of rhetoric that means nothing to me.

  4. Starpilot149 on January 28th, 2012 10:54 pm

    @donnyforte2 Then argue with the Constitution.

    All other candidates have the special interest groups backing them.

    Ron paul has the Constitution and the PEOPLE.

  5. nofxmike06 on January 28th, 2012 11:18 pm

    @khadar230 Are you dead yet?

  6. SuperSpaceMaster on January 29th, 2012 12:01 am

    A government policy of making these sorts of assassinations may result in government officials being assassinated in response. They should be very careful about going down this path.

  7. Junbringer on January 29th, 2012 12:16 am

    @donnyforte2 I can certainly respect that :) 

  8. donnyforte2 on January 29th, 2012 12:26 am

    @Junbringer Call it as you may. I just don’t support every bit of his foreign policy views. Leave it at that.

  9. Junbringer on January 29th, 2012 12:32 am

    @donnyforte2 There is a difference between isolationism and non-interventionism. Ron Paul is a strong voice for non-interventionism which is very very different from isolationism.

  10. anonymootle on January 29th, 2012 12:53 am

    @khadar230 Nah, they’re not that cool ;p

  11. khadar230 on January 29th, 2012 1:42 am

    The 4 persons who disliked this video are Assassins.

  12. RKarshenas on January 29th, 2012 1:53 am

    Law doesn’t matter to the people who carry this out. And even if it did, they will find a way around it.

  13. paftmont on January 29th, 2012 2:26 am

    Maggot. Many of our selected leaders have been photographed and video taped over the last century, wearing robes and chanting satanic phrases at secret satanic rituals at Bohemian Grove. Clinton, Carter, Kissinger, Nixon, Reagan, and yet we are not allowed to question their satanic rituals, or their “mock” sacrifices. So what does it matter if we can’t question more positive and moral religious mythology when these jerks have been secretly turning the country for New World Order?

  14. donnyforte2 on January 29th, 2012 3:25 am

    @maggot72494 By saying he wants creationism taught in science class. By passing a symbolic law saying students should be allow to pray in school when they weren’t under any sort of threat. By not allowing judges to question “God” in the Pledge of Allegiance. By saying he would abolish the DoE for state-local control… and if you’ve seen what Christian fundies have done to his state of Texas and their actions in the state board of education, you’d understand.

  15. maggot72494 on January 29th, 2012 4:12 am

    @donnyforte2
    We can’t afford to aid other countries, we need to aid ourselves. How has Ron Paul “fucked education up”?

  16. andre3355 on January 29th, 2012 4:41 am

    @Shrunkenhead61 very well said! but i do have to wonder if he would do more than talking…

  17. discussdebate on January 29th, 2012 5:27 am

    At the hands of indifference we’ve become a byproduct of afflicted servitude, encouraged to fight amongst ourselves invariably expurgating those that the propaganda of indifference tells us are aberrant; ultimately aiding and then aligning ourselves with the doctrine of and for Supremacy. * There are only those who serve themselves and or power… those who wish to separate us – wish to rule over us.

  18. donnyforte2 on January 29th, 2012 6:23 am

    @Shrunkenhead61 Not everything. He’s largely right about foreign policy and war, but I don’t accept his isolationism in regards to foreign aid during disasters. His domestic policy isn’t anymore reassuring. His argument basically boils down to ’state rights’ and that’s not an acceptable answer for everything…. especially from a Texan.

    Education should be the number one priority in every field of study. And he’s already managed to fuck that up.

  19. Shrunkenhead61 on January 29th, 2012 6:39 am

    @donnyforte2
    I don’t think it’s hard to understand that you don’t agree with creationism. I think things should be heard equally and weighed equally. Like I said before, Creationism is “out there”. I doubt it and it just assumes the doctrine of the bible.

    Just because he wants that bullshit in schools doesn’t make him baseless in everything he says.

    I despise most politicians but I have to admit he’s said more than some.

    Creationism is not science… it is crap. Yup.

  20. donnyforte2 on January 29th, 2012 7:15 am

    @Shrunkenhead61 “how does that affect anyone but him?”
    Because he advocates for creationism in science class.

    How hard is this to understand? It’s not science by a long shot.

  21. Shrunkenhead61 on January 29th, 2012 7:35 am

    @donnyforte2 I understand your concern and it’s good you are (very fucking reasonable). It’s up to people to decide. And I agree that creationism is a tad “out there”. But, I don’t think “Church and State” should be overlapped. We can all have our beliefs but at the end of the day… play a damn good game of football within the rules of football.

    Your right though, if a bunch of creationists people getting into power, they can trickle their “thoughts” down to a larger pool. Possible.

  22. Shrunkenhead61 on January 29th, 2012 7:42 am

    @donnyforte2 Right. If you sat down with many many politicians and average workers in America… beliefs are wide and far between. Try sitting down to a football player who believes his lucky coin helps his game. Are you going to look own on that football player for his belief?

    Ron Paul believes in creationism (I wont take that from him)… how does that affect anyone but him? Even if he gets in office, it’s not like somehow creationism is going to infiltrate your mind.

  23. donnyforte2 on January 29th, 2012 8:07 am

    @nagravaknin “is based on our values that our founding father stood for.”
    Sorry, they largely aren’t the Christian values that Ron Paulsy exclaims.

  24. nagravaknin on January 29th, 2012 8:35 am

    @donnyforte2 Everything is based on the constition is based on our values that our founding father stood for. Your statements are bullshit rhetoric.

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!





Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes